The High Court, in a major relief to a medical student, has ordered the National Medical Commission that the student be allowed to participate in the next round of NEET Undergraduate Counselling. This decision was made after it was claimed that the student had been denied an equal chance of securing admission in earlier rounds due to procedural or technical errors. This decision is seen as a powerful message for ensuring transparency and fairness during the NEET counselling.
Background of the case
The petitioner was a NEET-qualified UG student who approached the court when he could not secure admission, despite meeting all eligibility criteria and providing documents within the deadline. The student claimed their candidature had not been considered in the previous round NEET counselling due to a technical glitch or an administrative error.The student claimed that the mistake was not their fault but rather an error in the system of the counseling authority. They would have suffered irreparable losses if they were denied participation in the subsequent rounds, since medical admissions are only available for a certain academic year.
Court's Observations
While hearing the case, the High Court stressed the importance of maintaining transparency, fairness and equal opportunities during the NEET UG counseling process. The bench pointed out that NEET, a National-Level Examination, determines the future for lakhs of aspiring physicians. Even a small administrative mistake can cost an deserving student his dream career.The court noted that to deny the petitioner the chance to take part in the next counselling round would be unfair and against the principles of natural Justice. The court ordered the NMC to allow the student to participate in the next round of counselling, and to ensure that the candidate's candidature is treated fairly.
Role of NMC and Court Directive
The National Medical Commission in India was asked to take the necessary steps for the student to be included in the next round. The court asked the NMC for clear guidelines that would prevent future issues.The panel stressed the importance of a grievance mechanism that allows students to report errors made during the counseling process. The bench also urged authorities improve transparency in online counseling platforms, to avoid repeating similar disputes.
The impact of the Verdict
The judgement will be a relief for many students who have to face similar problems during NEET counseling every year. This judgment reinforces the notion that no worthy candidate should be denied their chance due to procedural or technical failures.Education experts welcomed the decision and called it a step in making the NEET counseling process more accountable.
Conclusion
The court's ruling in this NEET counseling case is a reminder to authorities that they must uphold fairness, and make sure students' aspirations and hard work are not compromised by administrative errors. These interventions are essential to maintain students' confidence in the system as NEET UG2025 counselling continues.Visit for more NEET updates, counseling schedules, and the latest news.
.png)
